- Pc medic software vs mcafee pdf#
- Pc medic software vs mcafee update#
- Pc medic software vs mcafee manual#
Last week, when I wrote about Microsoft's decision to expand its distribution of Microsoft Security Essentials via Microsoft Update, McAfee complained that free software simply isn't as good as its paid protection.
Pc medic software vs mcafee pdf#
Likewise, the booby-trapped PDF file (which all of the antivirus programs detected) relied on the user having a very outdated version of Adobe Reader installed, and mine was fully up-to-date.
Pc medic software vs mcafee update#
The exploit in question was blocked by a Java update that I had installed last year. The good news is that my system wasn't compromised in any way.
… We are currently testing our updated detection for this exploit and expect to release it shortly. This file contains a malicious java.class … that exploits the CVE-2008-5353 vulnerability. Sunbelt's Malware Response Manager, Dodi Glenn, reported that this file was in the company's repository and submitted it for detailed analysis. We are in the process of developing new heuristics to combat the effects from a stream of recent malicious JAR files more proactively, the file corresponding with the hash you mentioned is in the queue. Our Labs team took a look at the file you referenced and it is malicious. McAfee responded quickly to my e-mail as well. 0, which was released by Microsoft on July 9, 2010. This October 18 post by Holly Stewart on the Microsoft Malware Protection Center blog provides useful additional detail on why these types of attacks can be challenging for IDS/IPS vendors, as well as the steps customers should take to ensure that they are protected.Īccording to the scan results, this threat was first identified in definition. … his exact file is something we have seen in the wild more than 40,000 times in the past six months. There were more than 3.5 million reported CVE-2008-5353 attacks in Q3 2010, and Java vulnerability exploitations like these, while once a rare occurrence, have spiked this year. We have confirmed that the threat detection you received from Microsoft Security Essentials is indeed valid.
Microsoft had two analysts review the file. When I came back, here's a snippet of what I found: So I scheduled it to run while I was out running errands. Because I have 2.5 terabytes of hard disk space, with roughly 40% of it in use, I knew the scan would take a long time. Last month I decided to perform a scan using the Full option.
Pc medic software vs mcafee manual#
I typically disable the scheduled virus scans on my PCs and instead occasionally do a manual scan just to confirm that nothing out of the ordinary has snuck through. Mostly, I use it for real-time protection. I've had Microsoft Security Essentials (MSE) installed on my main working PC for most of the past year. The bottom line? Microsoft's free antivirus solution found and removed a threat that two well-known paid products missed. How effective is free antivirus software? I had a chance to see a real, in-the-wild example just this month, and the results were, to put it mildly, unexpected.
0 kommentar(er)
